Death of a Noise: Farewell to Steven Tyler’s Voice

Aerosmith's Steven Tyler. Photo by Japrea via flickr.com.

Steven Tyler’s voice has died, and I’m in mourning.

For me, rock ‘n’ roll began with Steven’s voice. In particular, it began with the world-eating scream that begins the song “Nine Lives,” the first track on the 1997 record of the same name. I was 14 when I saw Aerosmith on the Nine Lives tour, and not interested in music. I had to be dragged to see Aerosmith by a hip auntie, who told me: “You’ll never be cool if you don’t start liking rock ‘n’ roll.” I was sure I’d be bored. But then! Huge kabuki curtains descended across the stage of the Coral Sky Amphitheatre; the air filled with the yowls of a thousand angry cats; monster harmonic-minor chords squealed from an unseen guitar; Steven’s 50-foot silhouette appeared at center-stage, and –

“WHAAAAAAAAAAAA!”

I was doomed. Grinning, drooling, dancing. I felt as though a vast, non-verbal secret whose existence I’d never suspected was being revealed to me bar-by-bar; something that would rejigger all the fundaments of my hormone-soaked adolescent universe. And I was right. After the show I took up drums and guitar, slept with somebody for the first time, grew my hair, and eventually went to college to study music, chasing the primal thing I’d felt when Steven screamed at me.

I loved that scream, and I loved the strange, mercurial voice propelling it. Even when my listening tastes matured and I recognized the awesome breadth of dumbness exhibited by the Aerosmith catalog, the sound of Steven’s voice remained my favorite pure noise in all of rockdom. Now, careful listening to Aerosmith’s new single “Legendary Child” has convinced me that voice is gone forever. This essay is a eulogy.

Steven Tyler was never a naturally compelling vocalist. His true singing voice was arid and thin, neither pretty nor powerful. Throughout his career, he covered for his unlovely timbre with a series of increasingly clever affectations and tricks, the first of which he deployed on Aerosmith’s eponymous debut album in 1973. On Aerosmith, Steven centered his voice way back and way up in his throat, almost in his sinus cavity, to affect a gurbling noise that was probably supposed to approximate blackness. It didn’t work. Steven sounded like a young caucasian Muppet badly impersonating Louis Armstrong. Nevertheless, the sound could infuse a song with a compelling, rootsy otherwordliness. Listening today to “Movin’ Out,” the first song Steven wrote with guitarist Joe Perry, you hear a witchy beauty in the vocal that doesn’t exist anywhere else in rock; the whole performance sounds like a field recording of a 1940s proto-metal-folk outfit, imported from some bizarro universe where such things exist. The only song on Aerosmith on which Steven utilizes his true voice is “Dream On,” and there Steven sounds untrained and uncertain. In the crescendo, when Steven reaches for the famous octave jump, he’s hesitant and a little frightened, unsure the note is in reach.

Steven dispensed with the Satchmo nonsense for 1974′s Get Your Wings, and began searching for a voice to replace it. In the absence of one, he sounded underpowered. He also sounded sexy, knowing, puckish, and a little dangerous. He had swagger, and that made up for a lot of indifferent singing. Steven sounded much the same on 1975′s Toys In The Attic, and on the song “Adam’s Apple,” when Steven shoots the moon to hit the third-highest note he’d ever record, he doesn’t sound frightened at all. He knew his range by then. What he didn’t know was that he had a scream. Steven didn’t make that happy discovery until Rocks, in 1976, and then he went a little crazy with it. Rocks‘s very first song, “Back In The Saddle,” begins with an inhuman Tylerian blast, and Stevensings half-in, half-out of his screaming voice on most of the record’s songs. He continues to do so throughout Aerosmith’s next two studio records, and on a great many songs thereafter.

That half-screaming voice is the one you hear on “Dude (Looks Like A Lady)” and “Janie’s Got A Gun.” It’s the sound of a not-very-large man propelling a tremendous amount of air through his throat; the aural impression is of explosive outward pressure. The pressure makes the voice seem unstable, as though it’s about to dissolve into coughs or cracks, or perhaps break upwards into falsetto. (Steven never coughs and seldom cracks, but he does sometimes blast directly from belt to falsetto. Usually at the very ends of words, and especially words ending in a long “e” sound.) The voice sounds unstable, but it’s not – it goes wherever Steven wants it to, with a twitchy agility that belies the force required to keep its timbre consistent. Even singing full-force, Steven swoops, glides, and glissandos; half strongman and half acrobat. No one had ever sung that way before. No one has sung that way since.

And even Steven could never sing that way for long; say, through an entire concert. This was ably demonstrated by Aerosmith’s first live record, Live Bootleg!, in 1978. The whole band sounds worse-for-wear – they were, at the time, at least as interested in binge-drinking, heroin, and cocaine as they were in tuning their guitars – but Steven sounds unsurvivably ragged. Attitudinal and exciting, but his vocal cords are bleeding.

Steven developed a more sustainable vocal attack on 1979′s Night In The Ruts. Though he explores the melodic limits of scream-singing on a cover of the Shangri-La’s “Remember (Walking In The Sand),” most of the album is given over to a croakier, bluesier kind of singing that Steven had never before attempted. The new voice is most clearly present on “Reefer Headed Woman.” It’s an acidic sound, world-weary and wry; the voice of an over-sexed, over-aged adolescent who feels most relaxed in scary bars. It’s a casual voice, but surprisingly rangy. Singing in it, Steven can go high, low, loud, or soft, and sound fully at ease.

Steven stuck with that voice on most of his recordings until this year. It’s the voice you hear on “Angel,” “Rag Doll,” “Cryin’,” “Crazy,” “Pink,” “Jaded,” “Baby (Please Don’t Go),” and pretty much everywhere else. Steven spent the 80′s workshopping it, and by Get A Grip, in ’93, when Joe Perry’s hook-writing ability was on the wane, Steven had learned to combine it with his full-scream, half-scream, and Satchmo voice in a manic synthesis. Guitars are benched on Get A Grip, and songs’ whole skeletons are assembled by armies of overdubbed Stevens. The best singing of Steven’s career can be found there, and on Nine Lives. On that record, and especially on the songs “Kiss Your Past Goodbye” and “Ain’t That a Bitch,” Steven’s voice is a hurricane.

Steven turned 50 on the Nine Lives tour, and on the live record from the era, A Little South of Sanity, his many voices are full and ferocious. They are the first voices I heard when I discovered rock’n'roll, and from 1997 through 2002 I dragged a dozen friends and family members to Aerosmith concerts to hear them. By 2002, I was a collegiate music major and my guests were musicians. Among them was a voice major named Emily. After a show in Tampa that year, she was both awed and appalled. “He’s singing so wrong!” she told me. ”His voice should have given out two decades ago!”

It was true. Singing is generally the very worst thing one can do to a voice. To preserve the vocal cords, classically trained singers seldom stray far from a safe and limited range. Basso-buffos never sing basso-profundo; contraltos never sing alto; lyric sopranos seldom attempt music for coloratura or spinto sopranos. These safety-minded singers are left with two octaves, more-or-less, and a similarly limited dynamic range. Those singers who wander beyond their ranges tend not to last long. Maria Callas and Natalie Dessay, two wandering classical singers with otherwise fine technique, lost their voices by 40. Even more cautious singers tend to whither quickly. Half the polish was gone from Pavarotti’s voice by 1980. In rock’n'roll, where singers are more careless, voices have an even more limited shelf-life. Mick Jagger sounded tired at 35; Paul McCartney was frayed by Let It Be. And Robert Plant, the only singer of the “classic rock” era to sing as unsafely, as screamily, and as rangily as Steven Tyler, was voiceless by 25.

But Steven was a monster. The vastness of his various voices overwhelms Aerosmith’s late-90s music, in a way so singular that music critics have never thought to compare it to anything else. In the public imagination, Steven had become less a singer than a cartoon: an inhuman noisemaker, an ersatz bluesman, an improbable sex-machine, and a pioneer of cool fashions too idiosyncratic to imitate. (Though at age 15 did imitate them. The photographic evidence has been destroyed.) The fact that there was an actual person beneath Steven’s hats, an actual body beneath his rags, and a human throat producing his strange music, was lost.

The throat didn’t wish to remain lost. For the first time since 1975, Steven committed his actual voice to record on 1998′s “I Don’t Want To Miss A Thing.” It still sounded arid and thin. And when it made subsequent appearances on Aerosmith’s records – such as on the fantastically stupid “Avant Garden,” the last song on 2001′s Just Push Play - this listener, at least, cringed. But it was nice, too. The uber-confidence Steven had seemed to possess all his career now extended to his singing, and why not? No one complained, and “I Don’t Want To Miss A Thing” is now some kind of classic.

Steven’s voice wasn’t noticeably in decline on 2004′s Honkin’ On Bobo, an album of blues covers. Perhaps the falsetto wasn’t quite as high as it had been, nor as pure, but it was a near thingSteven sounded fine in various concerts and special appearances during his band’s long recording hiatus, right through the beginning of 2011. That year, he performed a truncated version of “Dream On” during the season finale of American Idol, and he was perfect. He could have been singing in 2001, 1991, or 1981. The vocal cords were ageless. And then they weren’t.

In bootlegs of Aerosmith concerts recorded during the fall of 2011, there’s a new gruffness in Steven’s voice. He had often sounded like he was shouting in his middle range before, but that was an affectation: now he really was shouting, and he could barely make it through 10- and 11-song sets. By the ends of concerts he was dodging his own melodies. He had long sought to preserve his voice in concert by ceding certain high harmonies to backing vocalists; now he was avoiding even the low harmonies, speak-singing whenever possible, and sometimes just mouthing the words. In January of this year, when Steven sang the National Anthem at a football game, he sounded pained – not just in the high notes, but in all the notes; grainy and nodular and wounded.

On “Legendary Child,” he sounds even worse. The vocal cords are too raw for screaming; now, for those cords, to sing is to scream. The production of music requires too much effort for Steven to summon up his wry bluesman’s voice, the appeal of which always had to do with how unforced it sounded. For the same reason, Steven’s natural timbre is probably out of reach, as is his fake Satchmo. What’s left to Steven now is his swagger and quirkiness; his willingness to make funny noises, to laugh and bark and wink with his voice. His attitude. That will probably be enough to carry his band’s forthcoming album, Music From Another Dimension (to be released in August), and it might even be enough to carry him through their Global Warming tour, which kicked off in Minneapolis on Saturday. But probably not. People show up at Rolling Stones’ concerts to see Mick Jagger, but go to Aerosmith concerts to hear Steven Tyler. This year, fans won’t. The noise that was Steven has passed from the stage forever, and no one will hear its like again. Truly, it is a sad time to be 14.

flattr this!

, , , , , ,

23 Responses to “Death of a Noise: Farewell to Steven Tyler’s Voice”

  1. David Von Bader
    June 20, 2012 at 2:40 pm #

    The first cd I bought with my own money was Get A Grip, and Nine Lives would later provide the theme music for just about every adventure I would have between the ages of 9-12, ultimately living in my trusty Panasonic Discman until its untimely death at the back of a summer camp bound school bus.

    I will forever love Aerosmith, despite Steven Tyler’s personality and uncontrollably graceless aging. As a guitarist, I’ve stolen more licks from Joe Perry than I can count, and he’s definitely personal hero of mine, to the point that I won’t eat a taco without his Boneyard Brew hot sauce involved.

    Thanks for the memories guys, and thanks for this excellent article Brandon.

    -DB

  2. David Von Bader
    June 20, 2012 at 2:46 pm #

    …and I just remembered that the summer camp I was attending (Pinecrest) had Aerosmith’s Revolution X in the make-shift arcade they brought in for the summers. Fuck, I’m going to cry.

    -DB

  3. Brandon K. Thorp
    June 20, 2012 at 4:33 pm #

    Excellent note, David. Thanks much.

    - BKT

  4. Barbara
    June 20, 2012 at 8:06 pm #

    Great article. While Mick will always be my first love, Steve Tyler has been a damned close second. After reading the “eulogy” I want to spend the night listening to the my favorites. Jamie’s Got a Gun, Dream On, Jaded, well, you get the thread. Memories, smiles & tears,
    Thanks much!

  5. RNRS001
    June 22, 2012 at 10:57 am #

    What a great article. The first thing I felt the same was when hearing Steven Tyler sing Chip Away The Stone on Idol. I figured he was just hoarse from not singing for a long time now, but when Legendary Child came out I heard the same Tyler sing, and the first thing I thought was “Oh wow, Steven Tyler’s voice is in serious decline.” He sounds hoarse on every performance now, and they couldn’t fix it anymore by putting all sorts of effects on his voice. I couldn’t however worded it better than you did. I rarely comment on articles posted on the internet apart from the messageboards I post on, but felt compelled to compliment you on your article.

  6. Sean
    June 22, 2012 at 11:06 am #

    Your article makes no sense. I have been seeing Aerosmith since i was 8 years old. Steven Tyler sounds just as good now as he did ten years ago. You are being way to HARSH. He is fuc**** 64 years old! I think he is doing great for his age. I would like to go see you at 64 go try and belt out songs and dance around like a nutcase. you would probably die of a heart attack! Now stop posting stupid articles about rock legends that are untrue. So why don’t you stop going to see Aerosmith so us diehards can have better seats. I am SOOOOO MAD! GO AEROSMITH!!!! STEVEN TYLER HAS FOUND THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH!!

    • Sherry Hodges
      June 22, 2012 at 1:15 pm #

      Hell yeah he has!! Love this man~

      • BlahBlah
        June 22, 2012 at 5:39 pm #

        Not that I disagree with you, but your comment begs a “Grow up!” He wrote a serious article, made his case, and claiming you are some diehard from 8 years-old…if you’re a fan from the 70s then you sound immature for a middle-aged person. Everything is opinions–don’t make Aerosmith fans look bad with this childish attitude.

        Steven’s voice changed from the 70s voice in the late 80s. His voice does get hoarser more often, which I’d expect. The author here is NOT describing Steven’s 70s vocals right–he’s missing a big part of those. Let him try to figure it out. But Steven still does have range, and better range than most of his peers who sang like that in the 70s…e.g. Robert Plant.

        I’ve seen lots of his peers, and may do sound good, but they didn’t stretch their vocals a lot to begin with. Steven has his up and down days (caused by various factors including being sick), but he’s one of the best performers for his age. This author just doesn’t have all his facts straight about the evolution of Steven’s vocals.

        Now, why couldn’t you respond with a bit more respect than that? I’m a fan from the 70s…just trying to show you the way so that YOUR opinion isn’t discounted. (:

  7. Angie Wallace (AeroAngie)
    June 22, 2012 at 12:19 pm #

    Its FAR from dead, check out some RAW footage of their recent tour, especially the Dream On and Train Kept Rollin…which was their ENCORE performance…for 64…he is and WILL remain a God….and you are WHO? Smh, always a turd in every punchbowl. Found it!!!

    • Sherry Hodges
      June 22, 2012 at 1:13 pm #

      Way to go Angie!! The ones that like to dis Steven are just jealous!!!

      • BlahBlah
        June 22, 2012 at 5:43 pm #

        Oh, I’m just getting on your cases. I don’t disagree with you, but saying someone is jealous is so f’in immature. The guy has a right to his opinion just as much as you do. Stop making Aerosmith fans look like petulant little children. I seriously doubt the author is jealous any more than movie critics are of directors. You see? (:

    • BlahBlah
      June 22, 2012 at 5:41 pm #

      Read my reply to Sean…you Aerosmith fans drive me batty. His opinion is equally as worth your opinion. People, grow up, and stop acting like defensive little kids! Just state your case/argument for what you believe. Crikes, I was never like this as a pre-teen in the 70s!

      • Jeff
        June 22, 2012 at 10:05 pm #

        And you know what drives me batty? So called intellectuals that get their rocks off on the internet by bashing others for what they truly love. Angie did state her case/argument perfectly. She said “let’s go to the tapes” which will prove that Tyler’s still got it. And if you watched said tapes you’d see that the man can still do it.

        I’ve seen Aerosmith many times over the last 10-15 years. They still put on the best show I’ve ever seen. Tyler’s voice is still strong enough to belt out all his high notes, all his screams, and to do at least a 20 song set each night (which when it comes to Aerosmith and his style of singing is no small feat). It might be hoarse, but it is no where near where this author seems to think. The fact of the matter is, YOU don’t like that we don’t share his opinion. And because of that, you label us as batty. Well, if being batty is disagreeing that Steven needs to be put to pasture because his voice is a little hoarse, than I’m as nutty and batty as they come.

        • BlahBlah
          June 23, 2012 at 1:33 am #

          Jeff, read the below carefully because you read things wrong,

          You said: So called intellectuals that get their rocks off on the internet by bashing others for what they truly love.

          Uhh, the guy who wrote the article obviously likes or liked Aerosmith. And stop with “the so called intellectuals” crap. The way those above got on the author’s case was immature. It doesn’t matter if they truly love ‘em or not, this kind of crap (an intellectual enough word for you?) such as:

          “So why don’t you stop going to see Aerosmith so us diehards can have better seats. I am SOOOOO MAD! GO AEROSMITH!!!! STEVEN TYLER HAS FOUND THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH!!

          No, that’s just an embarrassment. As I said I don’t disagree with them and I disagree with the author on many points. Maybe you should learn to read my comments better. I DON’T SHARE THE AUTHOR’S OPINION! So yeah, now add people (you) who can’t read posts as driving me batty too! ((:

  8. Lisa Lisa
    June 22, 2012 at 4:47 pm #

    As a longtime Aerosmith fan myself (sans musical degree), I’d like to know if you were aware that he had vocal chord surgery in 2007 and if that changes your opinion about anything. Also, have you seen his 2010 Kennedy Center performance?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeBArk9LZ5w
    I’d like to hear your thoughts on that STELLAR (IMO) performance. You mentioned his Idol performance of Dream On was right on; I’d like a dissection of the Abbey Road Medley he performed that night to honor Paul McCartney.

    I don’t disagree with much of what you said; I do disagree that his voice is gone. It’s only rock ‘n roll, right? Regardless, the man has created a legacy with that voice because – as you stated – No one had ever sung that way before. No one has sung that way since. It is the most unique voice I have ever had the pleasure of hearing in my life…in person, on my car radio, through my home speakers, on the telephone, and in concert.

  9. Brandon K. Thorp
    June 22, 2012 at 6:49 pm #

    Lisa Lisa:

    Thanks for reading. Yes, I’m aware of his vocal surgery, though I declined to mention it because it didn’t seem to appreciably affect his singing. And yes, I’ve seen Steven’s Kennedy Center performance. He was the best performer of the night, easy. As I say — Steven’s singing appeared to be more-or-less ageless right up until last summer, and then it went off a cliff.

    One thing I perhaps should have mentioned in the article: The gruffness and inflexibility in Steven’s voice right now was also evident on 1985′s “Done With Mirrors.” Why? I don’t know. But if you listen to his recent singing, it has far more in common with the singing on that record than it does with the singing on “Honkin’” or “Just Push Play.” Of course, Steven got over that bout of hoarseness. Maybe he’ll get over this one, too.

    - BKT

  10. Kim
    June 22, 2012 at 9:45 pm #

    Get the crap out of your ears, dude! He sounds amazing!

  11. Sean
    June 23, 2012 at 2:48 pm #

    BlahBlah you have a bad attitude. I don’t give a crap about what you say. I love Aerosmith and always have always will. ST hasn’t lost his voice.

  12. Last Child
    June 25, 2012 at 11:21 am #

    “He’s singing so wrong!” she told me. ”His voice should have given out two decades ago!”

    Is Emily still your friend? LOL

    No one had ever sung that way before. No one has sung that way since. ^^A^^

  13. marcel Singor
    June 30, 2012 at 6:43 am #

    I’ve been checking some things on you tube like SOS (Too bad) and back in the saddle from a
    show a few days ago and based on that I have to sat the article is waaay too harsh, that is some seriously high range powerfull singing wich pretty much nobody can do but him, and that’s besides the fact that he’s 64! He sounded just like he always did. I see what you mean with a couple of things, though like the hoarseness on legendary child but he has sounded like that on rock in a hard place as well wich is 1982

  14. Flame
    July 23, 2012 at 9:37 am #

    I have to disagree with you – I was at the Aerosmith Concert in Philly on the 21st and his voice and his screaming were amazing. He had so much energy I could barely believe he was 64.! I was sitting right next to the catwalk and it was amazing!

  15. Andy K
    April 27, 2013 at 7:57 am #

    I’m going to see them in Brisbane, Australia – next week. Now, I haven’t been watching him that closely – but I’ve yet to see a clip of Steve where he wasn’t singing well – ie, not hitting notes or laryngitis. I can’t say the same for nearly every hard rock band out there – there’s always at least one clip with the lead singer barely able to hit the notes after months of a gruelling world tour.

    Hats off to Steve for that. Aerosmiths rocks!

  16. Sad but true
    May 2, 2013 at 10:54 pm #

    ……So with all the modern equipment and the training supplied to the new age sound guys who have more degrees then any one cares to remember…….why does it sound like complete mud, the concert in Brisbane was a mess, it was not clear and way too loud. If the sound guy had dropped the level and cleaned up the mix it would have been awesome but no, he decided to drive the guts out of the system and produce a massive wall of mud. It wrecked the concert and Stevens voice was lost in it. BTW he can still sing as good as ever, maybe you need to look at overall sound not just one lone guy competing with an incompetent clearly deaf sound guy who couldn’t mix a packet cake. The same happened for the support band The Dead Daisies, they also were brilliant but sounded like rubbish cause of yet again poor sound. For all you wankers out there who claim that a support band should not get the same quality sound as the main act, pull your head in, we the CUSTOMER pay to see these bands and deserve to have a quality product. Its a joke and complete waste of money and a huge amount of disrespect to the artists.

Leave a Reply

QR Code Business Card